4.7 Article

Symbiotic solitons in quasi-one- and quasi-two-dimensional spin-1 condensates

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024207

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq (Brazil) [301324/2019-0]
  2. ICTP-SAIFR-FAPESP (Brazil) [2016/013437]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the formation of spin-1 symbiotic spinor solitons in a hyperfine spin F = 1 ferromagnetic Bose-Einstein condensate, showing that quasi-1D and quasi-2D solitons exhibit different spatial density structures.
We study the formation of spin-1 symbiotic spinor solitons in a quasi-one-(quasi-1D) and quasi -twodimensional (quasi-2D) hyperfine spin F = 1 ferromagnetic Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). The symbiotic solitons necessarily have a repulsive intraspecies interaction and are bound due to an attractive interspecies interaction. Due to a collapse instability in higher dimensions, an additional spin-orbit coupling is necessary to stabilize a quasi-2D symbiotic spinor soliton. Although a quasi-1D symbiotic soliton has a simple Gaussian-type density distribution, novel spatial periodic structure in density is found in quasi-2D symbiotic SO-coupled spinor solitons. For a weak SO coupling, the quasi-2D solitons are of the (-1, 0, +1) or (+1, 0, -1) type with intrinsic vorticity and multiring structure, for Rashba or Dresselhaus SO coupling, respectively, where the numbers in the parentheses are angular momenta projections in spin components F-z = +1, 0, -1, respectively. For a strong SO coupling, stripe and superlattice solitons, respectively, with a stripe and square-lattice modulation in density, are found in addition to the multiring solitons. The stationary states were obtained by imaginary-time propagation of a mean-field model; dynamical stability of the solitons was established by real-time propagation over a long period of time. The possibility of the creation of such a soliton by removing the trap of a confined spin-1 BEC in a laboratory is also demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据