4.6 Article

Multi-Depot Split-Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 112206-112220

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103640

关键词

Genetic algorithms; Vehicle routing; Statistics; Sociology; Approximation algorithms; Search problems; Programming; Vehicle routing problem (VRP); multi-depot split-delivery VRP; genetic algorithm (GA); taguchi method

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2018R1A2B3008890]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B3008890] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a mixed-integer programming model and a genetic algorithm for the multi-depot split-delivery vehicle routing problems, showing the benefits and competitive performance of the algorithms through optimized process parameters. The results of the study suggest that split-delivery has positive implications for reducing transportation costs.
The rapid advancements in information technologies and globalization change the way of distributing goods to customers. Many enterprises have multiple factories, warehouses, and distribution centers and strive for competitive efficiency in the distribution operations to minimize transportation costs. This study proposed the mixed-integer programming (MIP) model for the multi-depot split-delivery vehicle routing problems (MDSDVRPs) with hetero vehicles, allowing multiple visits to a customer. A genetic algorithm (GA) with a novel two-dimensional chromosome representation has been proposed with dynamic mutation policies. The process parameters of the proposed GA are optimized using the Taguchi method. The proposed algorithms showed the benefits of split-delivery in MDSDVRPs and showed the competitive performance even for the classical single-depot vehicle routing problems with no split-delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据