4.8 Article

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants by convalescent and BNT162b2 vaccinated serum

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25479-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust
  2. NIH [T32AI747225, R01AI145835]
  3. OHSU Innovative IDEA [1018784]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that serum from BNT162b2 vaccine recipients and convalescent COVID-19 patients has lower neutralization efficiency against SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, and this is negatively associated with patient age. The emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants are found to escape neutralization by serum antibodies, potentially leading to increased risk of reinfection or vaccine breakthrough.
Here, the authors show that neutralization of human sera from both BNT162b2 vaccine recipients and from convalescent COVID-19 patients is less efficient against SARS- CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 and negatively associated with patient age. SARS-CoV-2 and its variants continue to infect hundreds of thousands every day despite the rollout of effective vaccines. Therefore, it is essential to understand the levels of protection that these vaccines provide in the face of emerging variants. Here, we report two demographically balanced cohorts of BNT162b2 vaccine recipients and COVID-19 patients, from which we evaluate neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 as well as the B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) variants. We show that both B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 are less well neutralized by serum from vaccinated individuals, and that B.1.351, but not B.1.1.7, is less well neutralized by convalescent serum. We also find that the levels of variant-specific anti-spike antibodies are proportional to neutralizing activities. Together, our results demonstrate the escape of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants from neutralization by serum antibodies, which may lead to reduced protection from re-infection or increased risk of vaccine breakthrough.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据