4.6 Review

Data-driven algorithms for inverse design of polymers

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 17, 期 33, 页码 7607-7622

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sm00725d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1825352, 1933861]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture [2020-67030-31336]
  3. Sony Research Award Program 2019
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1933861] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1825352] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the application of data-driven methods in polymer design and the development and implementation of inverse design strategies. Through data-driven strategies such as representation of polymers, high-throughput virtual screening, global optimization, and generative models, reverse design of polymers has been achieved. The review also highlights the challenges and opportunities of this approach.
The ever-increasing demand for novel polymers with superior properties requires a deeper understanding and exploration of the chemical space. Recently, data-driven approaches to explore the chemical space for polymer design have emerged. Among them, inverse design strategies for designing polymers with specific properties have evolved to be a significant materials informatics platform by learning hidden knowledge from materials data as well as smartly navigating the chemical space in an optimized way. In this review, we first summarize the progress in the representation of polymers, a prerequisite step for the inverse design of polymers. Then, we systematically introduce three data-driven strategies implemented for the inverse design of polymers, i.e., high-throughput virtual screening, global optimization, and generative models. Finally, we discuss the challenges and opportunities of the data-driven strategies as well as optimization algorithms employed in the inverse design of polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据