4.7 Article

Are current preventive chemotherapy strategies for controlling and eliminating neglected tropical diseases cost-effective?

期刊

BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005456

关键词

health economics; onchocerciasis; soil-transmitted helminth infections; schistosomiasis; trachoma

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [106680/Z/14/Z]
  2. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis - UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/R015600/1]
  3. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis - UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) [MR/R015600/1]
  4. European Union
  5. NTD Modelling Consortium by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1184344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) continue to be a significant burden in low-income and middle-income countries, with preventive chemotherapy being the main control method. Current estimates show that preventive chemotherapy is generally cost-effective, but there are still evidence gaps that require further research. These findings are crucial for informing global health policy and supporting ongoing efforts in NTD control and elimination.
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in many low-income and middle-income countries. Several NTDs, namely lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) and trachoma, are predominantly controlled by preventive chemotherapy (or mass drug administration), following recommendations set by the WHO. Over one billion people are now treated for NTDs with this strategy per year. However, further investment and increased domestic healthcare spending are urgently needed to continue these programmes. Consequently, it is vital that the cost-effectiveness of preventive chemotherapy is understood. We analyse the current estimates on the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of the preventive chemotherapy strategies predominantly used for these diseases and identify key evidence gaps that require further research. Overall, the reported estimates show that preventive chemotherapy is generally cost-effective, supporting WHO recommendations. More specifically, the cost per DALY averted estimates relating to community-wide preventive chemotherapy for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis were particularly favourable when compared with other public health interventions. Cost per DALY averted estimates of school-based preventive chemotherapy for schistosomiasis and STH were also generally favourable but more variable. Notably, the broader socioeconomic benefits are likely not being fully captured by the DALYs averted metric. No estimates of cost per DALY averted relating to community-wide mass antibiotic treatment for trachoma were found, highlighting the need for further research. These findings are important for informing global health policy and support the need for continuing NTD control and elimination efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据