4.6 Article

Lattice model for the Coulomb interacting chiral limit of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene: Symmetries, obstructions, and excitations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075143

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-1916958]
  2. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory through NSF [DMR-1157490]
  3. State of Florida
  4. NSFC [12074276]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revisits the localized Wannier state description of twisted bilayer graphene, focusing on the chiral limit. It provides a simple method for constructing two-dimensional exponentially localized yet valley-polarized Wannier states while maintaining all unobstructed symmetries. The analysis includes unitary particle-hole symmetry, C2T symmetry, and chiral particle-hole symmetry.
We revisit the localized Wannier state description of the twisted bilayer graphene, focusing on the chiral limit. We provide a simple method for constructing such two-dimensional exponentially localized-yet valley polarized-Wannier states, centered on the sites of the honeycomb lattice, paying particular attention to maintaining all the unobstructed symmetries. This includes the unitary particle-hole symmetry, and the combination of C2T and the chiral particle-hole symmetry. The C2T symmetry alone remains topologically obstructed and is not represented in a simple site-to-site fashion. We also analyze the gap and the dispersion of single particle and single hole excitations above a strong coupling ground state at integer fillings, which we find to be dominated by the on-site and the nearest-neighbor terms of a triangular lattice hopping model, with a minimum at the center of the moire Brillouin zone. Finally, we use the insight gained from this real-space description to understand the dependence of the gap and the effective mass on the range of the screened Coulomb interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据