4.7 Review

Efavirenz: What is known about the cellular mechanisms responsible for its adverse effects

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 812, 期 -, 页码 163-173

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.07.016

关键词

HIV; Efavirenz; Toxicity; Antiretroviral therapy; Mechanisms; Adverse effects

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [PI14/00312, CIBER CB06/04/0071, SAF2015-67678-R]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (ERDF A way to build Europe)
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral contract) [JCI-2012-15124]
  4. Conselleria d'Educacio, Formacio i Ocupacio, Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HIV infection remains an important health problem worldwide. However, due to the efficacy of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), it has ceased to be a mortal condition, becoming a chronic disease instead. Efavirenz, the most prescribed non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), has been a key component of cART since its commercialization in 1998. Though still a drug of choice in many countries, its primacy has been challenged by the arrival of newer antiretroviral agents with better toxicity profiles and treatment adherence. The major side effects related to EFV have been widely described in clinical studies, however the mechanisms that participate in their pathogenesis remain largely ununderstood. This review provides an insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the development of the most significant undesired effects induced by efavirenz, both short-and long-term, revealed by in vitro and in vivo experimental pharmacological research. Growing evidence implicates the drug in energy metabolism, mitochondrial function, and other cellular processes involved in stress responses including oxidative stress, inflammation and autophagy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据