4.7 Article

Protective role of cGMP in early sepsis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 807, 期 -, 页码 174-181

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.05.012

关键词

Sepsis; Guanylate cyclase; Nitric oxide; Sildenafil; Phosphodiesterase

资金

  1. Fundagalo Araucaria [369/2012]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil [475297/2012-1]
  3. CAPES Foundation (Ministry of Education of Brazil)
  4. CAPES fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Septic shock, which is triggered by microbial products, is mainly characterised by inadequate tissue perfusion, which can lead to multiple organ dysfunction and death. An intense release of vasoconstrictors agents occurs in the early stages of shock, which can lead to ischemic injury. In this scenario, cGMP could play a key role in counterbalancing these agents and preventing tissue damage. Sildenafil, which is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, increases cGMP in smooth muscle cells and promotes vasodilation. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of treatment with sildenafil in the early stages of sepsis. Male rats were submitted to either cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or a sham procedure. Eight h after the procedure, the CLP and sham groups were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil (10 mg/kg, gavage) or vehicle, and twelve or twenty-four h later the inflammatory, biochemical and haemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Sepsis significantly increased levels of plasma nitrate/nitrite (NOx), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), urea, creatinine, creatine kinase and lactate. Additionally, sepsis led to hypotension, hyporesponsiveness to vasoconstrictor, renal blood flow reduction and also increased lung and kidney myeloperoxidase. Sildenafil increased renal blood flow and reduced the plasma levels of creatinine, lactate and creatine kinase, as well as reducing lung myeloperoxidase. Thus, phosphodiesterase inhibition may be a useful therapeutic strategy if administered at the proper time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据