4.6 Article

Protonation of cyclen-based chelating agents containing fluorescent moieties

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 36, 页码 16926-16938

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj03539h

关键词

-

资金

  1. MUR (Italian Ministry for University and Research within the PRIN) [2017EKCS35]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of three new polyamine receptors based on a common cyclen platform with different appended fluorophores was reported. The study showed that the structural features of these receptors are controlled by a balance between hydrogen bonding and electrostatic repulsions in their protonated species, while their emission properties are tuned by photoinduced electron and/or proton transfer processes.
The synthesis of three new polyamine receptors based on a common 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclododecane (cyclen) platform with appended, via a methylene linker, heteroaromatic fluorophores, a single quinoline (Q) or an 8-hydroxy-quinoline (8-OH-Q) moiety (L1 and HL2) or a Q and an 8-OH-Q unit (HL3), is reported. The proton binding features of these receptors, together with those of two similar receptors containing two equal Q moieties (L4) and two Q and two acetate groups (H(2)L5), have been studied by means of potentiometric, H-1 NMR, UV-vis absorption and fluorescence emission measurements in aqueous solution at different pH values. While cyclen is a commonly used binding unit, Q and 8-OH-Q represent classical examples of signalling units in conjugated fluorescent chemosensors and their protonation features can strongly influence their ability in metal cations, and anion coordination and sensing. This study reveals that the structural features of these receptors are controlled by a subtle balance between hydrogen bonding and electrostatic repulsions occurring in their protonated species. At the same time, their emission properties are tuned by photoinduced electron and/or proton transfer processes taking place in the excited state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据