4.0 Article

Modeling the Nonlinear Dynamics of Intracellular Signaling Networks

期刊

BIO-PROTOCOL
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

BIO-PROTOCOL
DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4089

关键词

Cell signaling; Nonlinear dynamics; Multistability; Oscillations; Bifurcations; Ordinary and partial differential equations

类别

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [R01CA244660]
  2. EU [731032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This protocol outlines a process for modeling the nonlinear behavior of intracellular signaling pathways, utilizing methods such as sampling parameter space and analyzing steady state stability to capture overall dynamic behavior. The protocol allows identification of main qualitative features, bifurcation analysis, and determination of borders separating different dynamical regimes within 2D parametric planes.
This protocol illustrates a pipeline for modeling the nonlinear behavior of intracellular signaling pathways. At fixed spatial points, nonlinear signaling dynamics are described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). At constant parameters, these ODEs may have multiple attractors, such as multiple steady states or limit cycles. Standard optimization procedures fine-tune the parameters for the system trajectories localized within the basin of attraction of only one attractor, usually a stable steady state. The suggested protocol samples the parameter space and captures the overall dynamic behavior by analyzing the number and stability of steady states and the shapes of the assembly of nullclines, which are determined as projections of quasi-steady-state trajectories into different 2D spaces of system variables. Our pipeline allows identifying main qualitative features of the model behavior, perform bifurcation analysis, and determine the borders separating the different dynamical regimes within the assembly of 2D parametric planes. Partial differential equation (PDE) systems describing the nonlinear spatiotemporal behavior are derived by coupling fixed point dynamics with species diffusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据