4.4 Article

Early cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult biliary stones is cost-effective

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17562848211031388

关键词

choledocholithiasis; decision model; ductal stone clearance; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; timing of cholangioscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares the cost-effectiveness of different timings for introducing single-operator cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy (SOC-EHL) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis. The results show that performing SOC-EHL during the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiography pancreatography (ERCP) is the least expensive strategy, while postponing it to the third ERCP is more expensive but more effective. Sensitivity analyses suggest that early SOC-EHL is the most optimal approach below a willingness-to-pay cut-off of US$20,295.
Background and Aims: Single-operator cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy (SOC-EHL) is effective and safe in difficult choledocholithiasis. The optimal timing of SOC-EHL use, however, in refractory stones has not been elucidated. The following aims to determine the most cost-effective timing of SOC-EHL introduction in the management of choledocholithiasis. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed assessing three strategies with a progressively delayed introduction of SOC-EHL. Probability estimates of patient pathways were obtained from a systematic review. The unit of effectiveness is complete ductal clearance without need for surgery. Cost is expressed in 2018 US dollars and stem from outpatient US databases. Results: The three strategies achieved comparable ductal clearance rates ranging from 97.3% to 99.7%. The least expensive strategy is to perform SOC-EHL during the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiography pancreatography (ERCP) (SOC-1: 18,506$). The strategy of postponing the use of SOC-EHL to the third ERCP (SOC-3) is more expensive (US$18,895) but is 2% more effective. (0.9967). SOC-EHL during the second ERCP in the model (SOC-2) is the least cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses show altered conclusions according to the cost of SOC-EHL, effectiveness of conventional ERCP, and altered willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds with early SOC-1 being the most optimal approach below a WTP cut-off of US$20,295. Conclusions: Early utilization of SOC-EHL (SOC-1) in difficult choledocholithiasis may be the least costly strategy with an effectiveness approximating those achieved with a delayed approach where one or more conventional ERCP(s) are reattempted prior to SOC-EHL introduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据