4.4 Article

A Machine Learning Approach to Differentiate Two Specific Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Androgen Receptor Pathway Genes

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15330338211027900

关键词

AR; metaplastic breast cancer; LAR; TNBC; random forest

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82002979]
  2. Scientific Research and Development Funds of Peking University People's Hospital [RDY2020-16]
  3. Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars' Scientific & Technological Innovation - the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BMU2020PYB022, BMU2021PYB013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of the androgen receptor pathway was found to be downregulated in metaplastic breast cancer compared to the luminal androgen receptor subtype of triple-negative breast cancer in this study. Molecular classification of these two breast cancer subtypes can be achieved using gene expression of the androgen receptor pathway with random forest.
Triple-negative breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular and histological subtypes. The Androgen receptor is expressed in a portion of triple-negative breast cancer cases and the activation of the androgen receptor pathway is thought to be a molecular subtyping signature as well as a therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer. Thus, identification of the androgen receptor pathway status is important for both molecular characterization andclinical management. In this study, we investigate the expression of the androgen receptor pathway in metaplastic breast cancer and luminal androgen receptor subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer and found that the androgen receptor pathway was downregulated in metaplastic breast cancer compared to luminal androgen receptor subtype. Using random forest, we found that the two subtypes of breast cancer can be molecularly classified with the gene expression of the androgen receptor pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据