4.6 Article

Evans model for dynamic economics revised

期刊

AIMS MATHEMATICS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 9194-9206

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/math.2021534

关键词

two-scale economics; two-scale fractal derivative; scale-dependent law; fractal variational principle; fractal economics

资金

  1. Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz [SCU.EM99.98]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper argues that economic phenomena should be observed in two different scales, and economic laws are scale-dependent. It proposes the concept of two-scale price dynamics and establishes a fractal variational theory for profit maximization. The paper explores the application of the Lagrange multiplier method to solve complex economic problems.
This paper argues that any economic phenomena should be observed by two different scales, and any economic laws are scale-dependent. A one-scale law arising in either macroeconomics or microeconomics might be mathematically correct and economically relevant, however, sparking debates might arise for a different scale. This paper re-analyzes the basic assumptions of the Evans model for dynamic economics, and it concludes that they are quite reasonable on a large time-scale, but the assumptions become totally invalid on a smaller scale, and a fractal modification has to be adopted. A two-scale price dynamics is suggested and a fractal variational theory is established to maximize the profit at a given period. Furthermore Evans 1924 variational principle for the maximal profit is easy to be solved for a quadratic cost function using the Lagrange multiplier method. Here a quadratic-cubic cost function and a nonlinear demand function are used, and the stationary condition of the variational formulation is derived step by step, and a more complex dynamic system is obtained. The present derivation process can be extended to a more complex cost function and a more complex demand function, and the paper sheds a promising light on mathematics treatment of complex economic problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据