4.7 Article

Laminate design, optimization, and testing of an innovative carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich panel for high-speed train

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 5811-5829

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26262

关键词

corrugated ribs; finite element analysis; laminate design; mechanical testing; sandwich panel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbon fiber-reinforced composite corrugated rib sandwich panel floor structure was designed and tested for a high-speed train equipment compartment, showing a weight reduction of approximately 35.7% compared to conventional metal structures and meeting applicable railway body structural requirements and fire protection standards. This research provides an effective design scheme for carbon fiber composite equipment and a systematic design process for other applications of carbon fiber composite structural parts.
An innovative type of carbon fiber-reinforced composite corrugated rib sandwich panel floor structure was designed and produced for a high-speed train equipment compartment, complying with the applicable railway car body structural requirements and railway fire protection standards. Using the finite element analysis (FEA) method there was conducted a four-step laminate design optimization for adjusting the mechanical properties of both the skin and corrugated ribs parts. A prototype was manufactured by an autoclave process and successfully submitted to static and fatigue mechanical testing for evaluation of the strength and stiffness of this structure as well as for correlation with the FEA model. It was finally concluded that requirements were met for this lightweight design and the weight reduction was approximately of 35.7% in comparison to the conventional metal structure. The research shown in this article does not only provide an effective carbon fiber composite equipment design scheme for the floor panel for high-speed trains, but also entails a methodical design process for other applications of carbon fiber composite structural parts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据