4.6 Article

Comparison of definitions for the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. The HELENA study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 176, 期 2, 页码 241-252

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2831-6

关键词

Metabolic risk factors; Insulin resistance; Youth; Metabolic criteria

资金

  1. European Community Sixth RTD Framework Programme [FOOD-CT-2005-007034]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BES-2014-068829]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RYC-2011-09011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various definitions are used to define metabolic syndrome in adolescents. This study aimed to compare, in terms of prevalence and differences, five frequently used definitions for this population: International Diabetes Federation, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP) modified by Cook, pediatric American Heart Association (AHA), World Health Organization, and Jolliffe and Janssen. A sample of 1004 adolescents (12.5-17.0 years) from the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study was considered. The components of the definitions (waist circumference/BMI, plasma lipids, glycemia, and blood pressure) were applied, and definitions were compared by using crosstabs, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficient. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome varied from 1.6 to 3.8% depending on the used definitions. Crosstabs comparing the definitions showed the fewest cases being misclassified (having metabolic syndrome or not) between NCEP-ATP and AHA. Analyses for kappa coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity confirmed this finding. Conclusion: The different definitions do not classify the same adolescents as having MS and prevalence varied between diagnostic methods. The modified NCEP-ATP and the AHA definitions were most analogous in defining subjects as having metabolic syndrome or not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据