4.6 Article

ATP utilization by a DEAD-box protein during refolding of a misfolded group I intron ribozyme

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015029

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R35-GM131777]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research reveals that several hundred ATP molecules are hydrolyzed during the refolding of each ribozyme molecule, specifically due to interactions with the misfolded ribozyme. This process is insensitive to changes in ATP and CYT-19 concentration, but decreases as ribozyme stability decreases.
DEAD-box helicase proteins perform ATP-dependent rear-rangements of structured RNAs throughout RNA biology. Short RNA helices are unwound in a single ATPase cycle, but the ATP requirement for more complex RNA structural rear-rangements is unknown. Here we measure the amount of ATP used for native refolding of a misfolded group I intron ribozyme by CYT-19, a Neurospora crassa DEAD-box protein that functions as a general chaperone for mitochondrial group I introns. By comparing the rates of ATP hydrolysis and ribozyme refolding, we find that several hundred ATP molecules are hydrolyzed during refolding of each ribozyme molecule. After subtracting nonproductive ATP hydrolysis that occurs in the absence of ribozyme refolding, we find that approximately 100 ATPs are hydrolyzed per refolded RNA as a consequence of interactions specific to the misfolded ribozyme. This value is insensitive to changes in ATP and CYT-19 concentration and decreases with decreasing ribozyme stability. Because of earlier findings that similar to 90% of global ribozyme unfolding cycles lead back to the kinetically preferred misfolded conformation and are not observed, we estimate that each global unfolding cycle consumes similar to 10 ATPs. Our results indicate that CYT-19 functions as a general RNA chaperone by using a stochastic, energy-intensive mechanism to promote RNA unfolding and refolding, suggesting an evolutionary convergence with protein chaperones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据