4.5 Article

ExOrthist: a tool to infer exon orthologies at any evolutionary distance

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02441-9

关键词

Alternative splicing; Orthology; Paralogy; Intron-exon structures

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [ERC-StG-LS2-637591]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia [BFU2017-89201-P]
  3. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013-2017 [SEV-2012-0208]
  4. EMBO Long Term postdoctoral fellowship [ALTF 1505-2015]
  5. Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions (MSCA) grant [705938]
  6. CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya
  7. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MEIC)
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [705938] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ExOrthist is a Nextflow-based software that enables inference of exon homologs and orthogroups, visualization of evolution of exon-intron structures, and assessment of conservation of alternative splicing patterns. It evaluates exon sequence conservation by considering the surrounding exon-intron context to derive genome-wide multi-species exon homologies.
Several bioinformatic tools have been developed for genome-wide identification of orthologous and paralogous genes. However, no corresponding tool allows the detection of exon homology relationships. Here, we present ExOrthist, a fully reproducible Nextflow-based software enabling inference of exon homologs and orthogroups, visualization of evolution of exon-intron structures, and assessment of conservation of alternative splicing patterns. ExOrthist evaluates exon sequence conservation and considers the surrounding exon-intron context to derive genome-wide multi-species exon homologies at any evolutionary distance. We demonstrate its use in different evolutionary scenarios: whole genome duplication in frogs and convergence of Nova-regulated splicing networks (https://github.com/biocorecrg/ ExOrthist).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据