4.7 Review

Soft actuators built from cellulose paper: A review on actuation, material, fabrication, and applications

期刊

出版社

VIETNAM NATL UNIV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2021.06.004

关键词

Soft actuator; Cellulose paper; Actuation mechanism; Material; Fabrication; Programmable action

资金

  1. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2020JQ-309, 2020JQ-872]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Innovation Fund of Xidian University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the milestones and recent achievements of cellulose paper-based actuators, discussing the application of cellulose paper in electro-, thermal, moisture, and magnetic actuation mechanisms, as well as available fabrication techniques. It also emphasizes the programmable actions of cellulose paper in emerging applications and the challenges it faces.
Cellulose paper, a material that is naturally derived, low cost, lightweight, eco-friendly, and mechanically deformable, plays important roles in producing next-generation flexible electronics. Following the booms in the development of functional electronics, the soft actuators built from cellulose paper have attracted great attention. In this focused review, the milestones and recent achievements of cellulose paper-based actuators are summarized. Electro-, thermal, moisture and magnetic actuation mechanisms are utilized to acquire energy from external stimuli. Corresponding functional materials and available fabrication techniques like film assembly and layer deposition are described. Programmable actions for the emerging applications in bionics, paper grippers and robots are realized by pursuing different strategies to control the responding deformation. Along with a conclusion, the existing challenges and possible solutions in evaluating and improving the performance of cellulose paper are summarized in the final section. (C) 2021 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Vietnam National University, Hanoi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据