4.1 Review

Computer Vision for Fire Detection on UAVs-From Software to Hardware

期刊

FUTURE INTERNET
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fi13080200

关键词

UAV; Computer Vision; fire detection; wildfire; smoke

资金

  1. MPhil program Advanced Technologies in Informatics and Computers by the Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, Greece

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The risk of fire hazard can have catastrophic consequences, but artificial intelligence combined with UAVs has been able to identify and avoid this risk through computer vision. Research has shown that multi-copters are the most common type of vehicle used, with the combination of RGB and thermal cameras being prevalent in most applications. The increasing trend in using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) indicates a shift towards more advanced technology in fire detection and prevention.
Fire hazard is a condition that has potentially catastrophic consequences. Artificial intelligence, through Computer Vision, in combination with UAVs has assisted dramatically to identify this risk and avoid it in a timely manner. This work is a literature review on UAVs using Computer Vision in order to detect fire. The research was conducted for the last decade in order to record the types of UAVs, the hardware and software used and the proposed datasets. The scientific research was executed through the Scopus database. The research showed that multi-copters were the most common type of vehicle and that the combination of RGB with a thermal camera was part of most applications. In addition, the trend in the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is increasing. In the last decade, many applications and a wide variety of hardware and methods have been implemented and studied. Many efforts have been made to effectively avoid the risk of fire. The fact that state-of-the-art methodologies continue to be researched, leads to the conclusion that the need for a more effective solution continues to arouse interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据