4.7 Review

Towards modeling spatiotemporal processes in metal-organic frameworks

期刊

TRENDS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 605-619

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.trechm.2021.04.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [647755]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (FWO) [11H6821N, 12T3519N]
  3. Research Board of Ghent University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid materials that exhibit anomalous responses to certain triggers, such as negative linear compressibility and negative thermal expansion. By controlling spatial heterogeneities and operating conditions, the dynamic response of MOFs can be adjusted. Studying the spatiotemporal evolution of MOFs under working conditions is significant for materials science.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid materials constructed from metal clusters linked by organic linkers, which can be engineered for target functional applications in, for example, catalysis, sensing, and storage. The dynamic response of MOFs on external stimuli can be tuned by spatial heterogeneities such as defects and crystal size as well as by operating conditions such as temperature, pressure, moisture, and external fields. Modeling the spatiotemporal evolution of MOFs under operating conditions and at length and time scales comparable with experimental observations is extremely challenging. Herein, we give a status on modeling spatiotemporal processes in MOFs under working conditions and reflect on how modeling can be reconciled with in situ spectroscopy measurements. Defining the spatiotemporal response of metal-organic frameworks MOFs emerged in the past few decades as an intriguing and versatile class of materials showing anomalous responses to certain triggers. A few examples of such atypical behavior are: negative linear compressibility [2], where on the exertion of pressure the material expands along one or more directions instead of contracting; negative thermal expansion [3-5], where the material

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据