4.7 Article

Derivation of Mouse Parthenogenetic Advanced Stem Cells

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168976

关键词

parthenogenetic embryos; parthenogenetic diploid stem cells; epiblast stem cells; pluripotency

资金

  1. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan of China [2020ZD0007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32060176]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parthenogenetic embryos have been studied extensively for their potential in generating various stem cell lines with distinct characteristics compared to traditional pluripotent stem cells. By manipulating the culture medium components, researchers were able to demonstrate the conversion from primed state to advanced state stem cells, showing enhanced developmental potential.
Parthenogenetic embryos have been widely studied as an effective tool related to paternal and maternal imprinting genes and reproductive problems for a long time. In this study, we established a parthenogenetic epiblast-like stem cell line through culturing parthenogenetic diploid blastocysts in a chemically defined medium containing activin A and bFGF named paAFSCs. The paAFSCs expressed pluripotent marker genes and germ-layer-related genes, as well as being alkaline-phosphatase-positive, which is similar to epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs). We previously showed that advanced embryonic stem cells (ASCs) represent hypermethylated naive pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Here, we converted paAFSCs to ASCs by replacing bFGF with bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), CHIR99021, and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in a culture medium, and we obtained parthenogenetic advanced stem cells (paASCs). The paASCs showed similar morphology with ESCs and also displayed a stronger developmental potential than paAFSCs in vivo by producing chimaeras. Our study demonstrates that maternal genes could support parthenogenetic EpiSCs derived from blastocysts and also have the potential to convert primed state paAFSCs to naive state paASCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据