4.7 Article

Spatial Variability of Production and Quality in Table Grapes 'Flame Seedless' Growing on a Flat Terrain and Slope Site

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7080254

关键词

coefficient of variation; geostatistical analysis; hyper-arid conditions; precision viticulture; Vitis vinifera

资金

  1. VRIP-UCM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found higher spatial variability in vineyards cultivated on slopes, and precision agriculture tools can be useful for zoning vineyards to improve economic returns and sustainability.
(1) Background: Precision agriculture has been used mostly to study spatial variability in vineyards for winemaking. Nevertheless, there is little available information on the impacts of its use on table grape vineyards under different slope conditions. (2) Methods: The aim was to study the spatial variability of production and berry quality in 'Flame Seedless' vines established on a flat (3% slope) and sloping (23% slope) terrain in the Chilean hyper-arid northern region. (3) Results: The results showed that in both vineyards, the measured variables presented a high spatial variability according to their coefficient of variation, being higher in slope than in the flat vineyard. The geostatistical analysis showed that 82% of the measured variables presented a strong spatial dependence in the slope vineyard, whereas 45% and 55% of the variables measured in the flat vineyard presented strong and moderate spatial dependence, respectively. Elevation was related to berry quality parameters in both vineyards, while trunk vine circumference was related to berry quality for the slope vineyard and to yield for the flat vineyard. (4) Conclusions: There is an important spatial variability in table grape vineyards mostly those cultivated on slope sites. Therefore, precision agriculture tools can be useful for zoning table grape vineyards, and thus improving both economic returns of viticulturists and sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据