4.0 Article

Psychedelic Drugs and Atheism: Debunking the Myths

期刊

RELIGIONS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rel12080614

关键词

psychedelic drugs; atheism; monotheism; pantheism; depression; neurotheology

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surveys and clinical trials indicate that the popular inferences linking psychedelic drug use with changes in atheism beliefs and depression relief are misleading. Most psychedelic atheists do not completely abandon their former convictions, and there is strong evidence that they do not adopt traditional monotheistic beliefs. Additionally, the idea that psychedelic drugs cure depression by curing atheism is complicated by personal testimonies and the results of microdose clinical trials. The broader field of neurotheology also contributes to these popular misconceptions.
Two recent surveys of people who took psychedelic drugs and reported God experience encounters, along with successful clinical trials using psychedelic therapy for depression, have given rise to public misconceptions about psychedelics and atheism. Specifically, three inferences have been drawn: (1) that the psychedelic experience tends to dissolve atheist convictions; (2) that atheist convictions, once dissolved, are replaced with traditional monotheist beliefs; and (3) that atheism and depression somehow correlate as afflictions for which psychedelic drugs offer relief. This paper argues, based on analysis of the studies and trials along with relevant supplemental evidence, that each of these popular inferences is substantially misleading. Survey data do not indicate that most psychedelic atheists have cleanly cut ties with their former convictions, and there is strong evidence that they have not traded atheism for traditional monotheism. Both personal testimony and the effectiveness of microdose clinical trials serve to complicate any notion that a psychedelic drug alleviates symptoms of depression by curing atheism. The paper then extends its focus to argue that the broader field of neurotheology includes elements that contribute to these popular misconceptions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据