4.8 Article

Aggregation-induced delayed fluorescence luminogens: the innovation of purely organic emitters for aqueous electrochemiluminescence

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 40, 页码 13283-13291

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc02918e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research & Development Projects in Key Areas of Guangdong Province, China [2019B010933001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773195]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B030301003, 2021A1515010510, 2021B1515020048]
  4. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project [202102010409, 202102010390, 202102010487]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new aqueous electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technique based on aggregation-induced delayed fluorescence (AIDF) luminogens. Compared with traditional organic AIE luminogens, AIDF luminogens show higher ECL efficiency.
Due to overcoming the limitation of aggregation caused quenching (ACQ) of solid-state emitters, aggregation-induced emission (AIE) organic luminogens have become a promising candidate in aqueous electrochemiluminescence (ECL). However, restricted by the physical nature of fluorescence, current organic AIE luminogen-based ECL (AIECL) faces the bottleneck of low ECL efficiency. Here, we propose to construct de novo aqueous ECL based on aggregation-induced delayed fluorescence (AIDF) luminogens, called AIDF-ECL. Compared with the previous organic AIE luminogens, purely organic AIDF luminogens integrate the superiorities of both AIE and the utilization of dark triplets via thermal-activated spin up-conversion properties, thereby possessing the capability of close-to-unity exciton utilization for ECL. The results show that the ECL characteristics using AIDF luminogens are directly related to their AIDF properties. Compared with an AIECL control sample based on a tetraphenylethylene AIE moiety, the ECL efficiency of our AIDF-ECL model system is improved by 5.4 times, confirming the excellent effectiveness of this innovative strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据