4.2 Article

Do developmental milestones at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months predict IQ at 5-6 years old? Results of the EDEN mother-child cohort

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 272-279

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.11.001

关键词

Developmental milestones; Cognitive development; IQ; Intelligence Giftedness; Intellectual disability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: The present study aims: (i) to determine how well developmental milestones at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months may predict IQ at 5-6 years old, (ii) to identify cognitive domains during the first two years that best predict later IQ and (iii) to determine whether children with IQ in the normal range at 5-6 years old may differ from disabled (IQ < 70) and gifted children (IQ > 130) with regard to their early cognitive development. Method: The main developmental milestones were collected through self-administered questionnaires rated by parents at 4, 8, 12 and 24 months and through parental questionnaires administered by a trained interviewer and questionnaires completed following a medical examination at 12 months. These questionnaires were derived from the Brunet-Lezine Psychomotor Development Scale and they addressed several cognitive domains (gross and fine motor skills, language and socialization). Results: (i) Developmental milestones predict a substantial part of the later IQ variance from 24 months (R-2 similar to 20%). (ii) Early language skills more strongly predict later IQ than the other cognitive domains. (iii) Several cognitive domains, but particularly language skills, predict disabled children at 5-6 years old (from the age of 8 months) and gifted children (from the age of 12 months). Discussion: The present study provides valuable information for early developmental assessment and could contribute to a better understanding of intellectual development. (C) 2016 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据