4.0 Article

Physiological changes in soybean cultivated with soil remineralizer in the Cerrado under variable water regimes

期刊

PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EMPRESA BRASIL PESQ AGROPEC
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01455

关键词

Glycine max; line source; mica schist; photosynthesis; water stress

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of fine-graded mica schist on soybean growth and yield, finding that as water availability decreased and crop development advanced, soybean physiology and yield declined, with grain quality mainly affected by water conditions.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the soil remineralizer fine-graded mica schist (FMS) on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, yield, and grain quality under different water regimes (WRs) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was conducted under field conditions for two years, using four WRs and three treatments: mica schist, conventional fertilization, and control. In 2017 and 2018, the following WRs were evaluated: WR1, WR2, WR3, and WR4, corresponding to a mean value of 100, 65, 44, and 28% of crop evapotranspiration replacement, respectively. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration, effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (F-v'/F-m'), quantum yield (PSII) (phi(FSII)), and electron transport rate reduced as a function of the advanced phenological stage of soybean and the reduction in WR. Grain quality was only affected by the WR. The mica schist was statistically similar to conventional fertilization and the control in 2017 and 2018. Yield decreased due to the anticipation of soybean phenological age and WR, but there were no differences between the three treatments in 2017 and 2018. The reduction in soybean yield is attributed to stomatal closure, loss of photoprotective capacity, and damage to the photosynthetic machinery caused by drought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据