4.6 Review

Implementation and acceleration of optimal control for systems biology

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0241

关键词

convergence acceleration; forward-backward sweep method; optimal control; Wegstein; Aitken-Steffensen; Anderson

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program
  2. AF Pillow Applied Mathematics Trust
  3. Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers [CE140100049]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP200100177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the application of Pontryagin's maximum principle (PMP) in optimal control and the implementation of the forward-backward sweep method (FBSM). By conceptualizing FBSM as a fixed point iteration process and adapting existing acceleration techniques, the rate of convergence can be improved without costly tuning. Moreover, these methods can induce convergence in cases where the FBSM fails to converge.
Optimal control theory provides insight into complex resource allocation decisions. The forward-backward sweep method (FBSM) is an iterative technique commonly implemented to solve two-point boundary value problems arising from the application of Pontryagin's maximum principle (PMP) in optimal control. The FBSM is popular in systems biology as it scales well with system size and is straightforward to implement. In this review, we discuss the PMP approach to optimal control and the implementation of the FBSM. By conceptualizing the FBSM as a fixed point iteration process, we leverage and adapt existing acceleration techniques to improve its rate of convergence. We show that convergence improvement is attainable without prohibitively costly tuning of the acceleration techniques. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these methods can induce convergence where the underlying FBSM fails to converge. All code used in this work to implement the FBSM and acceleration techniques is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Jesse-Sharp/Sharp2021.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据