4.5 Article

On the Basicity of Conjugated Nitrogen Heterocycles in Different Media

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2017, 期 30, 页码 4475-4489

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201700749

关键词

Nitrogen heterocycles; Basicity; Solvent effects; Hydrogen bonds; Peri effect

资金

  1. EU through the European Regional Development Fund [TK141]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of Estonia [IUT20-14]
  3. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2014-09-3386]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we explored the relationship between the structure and solvent effects on the basicity of a large selection of conjugated N-heterocyclic nitrogen bases in different media: the polar aprotic solvent acetonitrile, the polar protic solvent water and the gas phase. Altogether, 58 previously unpublished basicity values in different media for 39 compounds are presented, including 30 experimentally determined pK(a) values in acetonitrile. We present the pK(a) and gas-phase basicity values for quino[7,8-h]quinoline, which is one of the most basic conjugated nitrogen heterocyclic compounds without basicity-enhancing substituents. The trends in basicity are rationalized by comparing the basicity data of related compounds in different solvents, as well as by using isodesmic reactions. The gas-phase basicity is predominantly determined by the ability of a molecule to disperse the excess positive charge over a large number of atoms. In solution the situation is less clear and smaller systems with localized charge often lead to higher basicities because of solvent effects. In particular, it was found that the fusion of an additional benzene ring does not always lead to an increase in basicity in solution: its effect can be either basicity-increasing or -decreasing, depending on the ring size, number and position of nitrogen atoms and medium. A correlation between the measured pK(a) values in MeCN and in water suggests that these two different solvents exert a similar effect on the basicity of the studied heterocycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据