4.6 Article

Energy Optimality in Electric Vehicles Along Uphill-Downhill Roads

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 390-405

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIV.2020.3033287

关键词

Roads; Batteries; Wheels; Electric vehicles; Mathematical model; Optimal control; Optimization; Electric vehicles; energy optimization; icy road skidding; optimal control; sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an energy optimal controller is designed and detailed sensitivity analyses are performed. The superiority of the energy optimal controller is verified through tests in different road conditions, and a skidding compensation logic is proposed. The study shows that the energy optimal controller is not sensitive to changes in mass and its distribution, and performs significantly well when charging capability is limited.
In this paper, an energy optimal controller is designed with torque, speed and battery constraints, and detailed sensitivity analyses are performed. The design is tested on the gross motion mathematical model of the vehicle moving on a variable-slope road in scenarios including uphill and downhill road sections of various slopes and lengths. The tests are repeated along roads with icy slopes, and the superiority of the energy optimal controller is verified for roads with low friction coefficients. A skidding compensation logic is proposed, and it is observed that the energy optimal solution is insensitive to such compensation methods. Further sensitivity analyses are performed, and it is shown that as a representative of different passenger seating arrangements, the sensitivity of the energy optimal controller to the changes in mass and its distribution is small in magnitude. The tests with different initial state-of-charge of the battery demonstrate that the superiority of the energy optimal controller becomes significant especially when battery characteristics limit the charging capability during regenerative braking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据