4.7 Article

Surface growth during random and irreversible multilayer deposition of straight semirigid rods

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034103

关键词

-

资金

  1. CONICET (Argentina) [PIP112-201101-00615]
  2. Universidad Nacional de San Luis (Argentina) [03-0816]
  3. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, MESCYT-Dominican Republic [FONDOCYT-2016-2017-084]
  4. OAS Academic Scholarship Program (Graduate)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that during the deposition process of straight semirigid rods on lattices, the surface roughness evolves with time exhibiting two different behaviors: homogeneous growth and segmented growth. At long times, the roughness of the systems increases linearly, which is attributed to the segmented growth process.
Surface growth properties during irreversible multilayer deposition of straight semirigid rods on linear and square lattices have been studied by Monte Carlo simulations and analytical considerations. The filling of the lattice is carried out following a generalized random sequential adsorption mechanism where the depositing objects can be adsorbed on the surface forming multilayers. The results of our simulations show that the roughness evolves in time following two different behaviors: an homogeneous growth regime at initial times, where the heights of the columns homogeneously increase, and a segmented growth regime at long times, where the adsorbed phase is segmented in actively growing columns and inactive nongrowing sites. Under these conditions, the surface growth generated by the deposition of particles of different sizes is studied. At long times, the roughness of the systems increases linearly with time, with growth exponent I3 = 1, at variance with a random deposition of monomers which presents a sublinear behavior (I3 = 1/2). The linear behavior is due to the segmented growth process, as we show using a simple analytical model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据