4.1 Article

Revisiting the Mechanical Limited-Slip Differential for High-Performance and Race Car Applications

期刊

ENGINEERING LETTERS
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

NEWSWOOD LTD

关键词

limited slip differential; vehicle dynamics; vehicle stability; torque bias diagram; yaw moment control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper revises the working principles and limitations of mechanical limited-slip differentials, highlighting their impact on vehicle dynamics being overlooked in current literature. The authors aim to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive literature review and intuitive explanations of limited slip systems' effects.
This paper provides a comprehensive revision of the working principles and limitations of the mechanical limited-slip differential (LSD), a passive device used to improve traction capabilities and to extend the performance envelope of high-performance road cars, racing and rally cars. The LSD has been in use for decades. However, according to the authors' experience, its impact on vehicle dynamics appears to be somewhat neglected in the literature and often misunderstood, especially in the semi-pro racing community. Current research on the subject is usually focused on side aspects and/or on modern control applications such as active differentials and torque-vectoring systems. These state-of-the-art technologies still rely on the same principles of the LSD, which should therefore be fully explained. The authors intend to fill this gap by starting with a comprehensive literature review. Then, an intuitive explanation of the impact of limited slip systems on vehicle behaviour is proposed with simple mathematical models and examples to integrate what seems to be missing. The peculiar shape of the torque-sensitive LSD working zone on the torque bias diagram is explained to an unprecedented level of detail. Real-world application examples are provided, including data recorded on a single-seater racecar integrated with examples based on a virtual model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据