4.7 Article

Enzymatic extraction of pectic oligosaccharides from finger citron (Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis Swingle) pomace with antioxidant potential

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 12, 期 20, 页码 9855-9865

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1fo01576a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY18B020021]
  2. Zhejiang Xinmiao Talent Program [2020R403084]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education [Y202043177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, pectinase-based and ultrasonic-assisted extraction method was used to extract pectic oligosaccharides (POS) from finger citron pomace, achieving a maximum conversion rate of 64.5%. The purified FCPOS-1, a homogeneous oligosaccharide with remarkable antioxidant properties, showed potential as a natural antioxidant for applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
Finger citron pomace is a cheap and renewable by-product of the citrus processing industry, representing up to 60% of the fruit biomass. In this study, a pectinase-based and ultrasonic-assisted method was firstly used to extract pectic oligosaccharides (POS) from finger citron pomace. Using the orthogonal experiment design (OED), the maximum conversion rate of up to 64.5% from pomace to POS was obtained under the extraction conditions of 0.25 mg mL(-1) pectinase and 50 mg mL(-1) pectin at 45 degrees C and pH 4.5 for 2 h. The extracted POS was then fractionated and purified to homogeneous oligosaccharides (FCPOS-1) with a molecular weight of 2.15 kDa, and the analyses of monosaccharide composition, FTIR, NMR and ESI-MS indicated that FCPOS-1 consisted of GalA and a small amount of mannose, galactose and arabinose. Multiple antioxidant activity assays in vitro revealed that FCPOS-1 possessed remarkable antioxidant properties, especially scavenging activity against DPPH radicals up to 94.07%. FCPOS-1 has the potential to be an effective natural antioxidant for applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据