4.7 Article

Rotating Machine Systems Fault Diagnosis Using Semisupervised Conditional Random Field-Based Graph Attention Network

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3091212

关键词

Condition monitoring; graph neural network (GNN); motor fault diagnosis; rotating machine; semisupervised learning (SSL)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [52077064]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Provence [2018GK2073]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support [6142003200203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A semisupervised conditional random field-based graph attention network algorithm is proposed for fault diagnosis and condition monitoring, achieving semisupervised fault diagnosis by modeling label dependency and learning object representations, and optimized with the variational expectation-maximization algorithm.
Data-driven intelligent diagnosis methods require sufficient labeled data during training, which are usually limited in practice. A semisupervised conditional random field-based graph attention network (CRF-GAT) algorithm is proposed in this article for fault diagnosis and condition monitoring. The proposed method combines the advantages of CRF and GAT, and therefore, it achieves semisupervised fault diagnosis by modeling the label dependency and learning object representations. The scheme is optimized with the variational expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. Specially, the clustering with adaptive neighbor (CAN) method is introduced for constructing the graph. The proposed method is applied in induction motor (IM) and permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM), which achieves the identification of the motor status, fault severity, and working condition. The results show that the CRF-GAT can realize an accuracy of above 97% with even below 10% of labeled samples for training, which demonstrates that it is an effective method in semisupervised fault diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据