4.1 Article

Diabetic macular edema outcomes in eyes treated with fluocinolone acetonide 0.2 μg/d intravitreal implant: real-world UK experience

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 357-362

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000929

关键词

Diabetic macular edema; Fluocinolone acetonide; Iluvien (R)

资金

  1. Alimera Sciences Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To conduct an observational, multicenter study to evaluate real-world clinical efficacy and safety of the 0.2 mu g/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in the treatment of patients with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) in 3 large hospital ophthalmology departments in the United Kingdom. Methods: Fluocinolone acetonide implants were inserted into the study eyes following a suitable washout period; phakic eyes received FAc implant following cataract surgery. Follow-up visits took place 2-4 weeks postinjection and then at 3, 6, and 12 months; change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline was measured by optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also assessed. Adverse events and changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded in order to evaluate the safety profile for the FAc implant. Results: Improvements in BCVA and CMT were observed from 3 months and sustained for the duration of observation. At 12 months, the overall mean change from baseline CMT was -126 mu m and mean increase in BCVA from baseline was 5.1 letters. Increases in IOP following FAc implant were easily managed with IOP-lowering medication. Implant migration into the anterior chamber occurred in 2 eyes where prior vitrectomy had resulted in a posterior capsule defect; this was rectified and resolved. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further efficacy and safety profile data for FAc implant treatment of chronic DME in a real-world clinical setting; the FAc implant appears to be a valuable therapeutic approach for patients with chronic DME who have suboptimal response to other treatment options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据