4.7 Article

The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 256, 期 1, 页码 139-150

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.011

关键词

Customer returns policy; Game theory; Pricing; Money-back guarantee; Supply chain management

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [372400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71102073, 71571102, 71331004, 71171165, 71272128, 71432003]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130185110006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient distribution of the product in a supply chain is a critical issue in supply chain management. In the paper, we study a manufacturer Stackelberg supply chain in which a retailer can sell either or both of two brands, a well-known brand and a new brand, in a market supplied by two manufacturers. The two brands are differentiated by customer satisfaction rate. The supply chain involves both vertical competition between the retailer and manufacturers, and horizontal competition between the two manufacturers. We identify the conditions under which the retailer should choose one or both of the two manufacturers, and we show that in certain circumstances, the retailer will prefer to work with both manufacturers, even though one brand of product may have no sales. We find that whether a money-back guarantee (MBG) returns policy should be offered for the supply chain depends only on whether or not the retailer can recover the value of the returned product efficiently, even when the retailer incurs a net cost by accepting returns. We also show that an MBG enhances the profit of the manufacturer with low satisfaction rate, resulting in an increase in both the wholesale price and demand, but it has an opposite impact on the manufacturer with high satisfaction rate. In addition, an MBG enhances the retailer's profit and expands the overall market. Numerical examples are included to illustrate the major results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据