4.7 Article

When to introduce an online channel, and offer money back guarantees and personalized pricing?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 257, 期 2, 页码 614-624

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.031

关键词

Dual-channel; Uniform pricing; Personalized pricing; Customer returns policy

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [372400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71331004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sales through an online channel are increasingly popular in the retailing industry. Customers, however, cannot touch or feel a product before they purchase online. This leads to much higher rates of customer returns in the online channel, which in turn leads to significant costs to retailers. In this paper, we develop a model of a dual-channel structure with online and brick-and-mortar channels, in order to determine when a retailer should introduce an online channel and how it should define returns policies for the two channels. We identify the conditions under which a retailer should choose a dual-channel structure, and show that the retailer should offer a Money-Back Guarantee (MBG) in a channel as long as the net salvage value of the returned product is positive in that channel. In addition, if uniform pricing is used in both channels, it is optimal for the retailer to simply set the prices for each channel as if the two channels were operated separately. Our analysis leads to a simple three-step process to help the retailer make a channel selection, choose a product returns policy, and decide on price. We also examine the implications of personalized pricing (PP) in the online channel for the retailer's channel selection and choice of returns policy. We show that PP makes the online channel more attractive and makes the retailer more likely to adopt MBGs. The impact of PP on pricing for both channels is also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据