4.3 Article

Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.003

关键词

AMH; Hysterectomy; Ovarian reserve

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate changes of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy by comparing serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to those of non-laparoscopic hysterectomy (non-LH). Methods: Prospectively, serum AMH levels were measured pre-operatively (AMHO), 7 days (AMH1), 2 months (AMH2), and 6 months (AMH3) after LH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) and non-LH (vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy) in 91 premenopausal women (LH = 60, non-LH = 31). Changes of serum AMH levels were compared between the two groups. Results: AMHO was similar between the two groups (P = 0.400). Also, AMH1, AMH2, and AMH3 were not different between the two groups (P = 0.333, 0.534, and 0.726). A significant decrease of serum AMH level (30% decreases from AMHO) at 7 days, 2 months, and 6 months was observed in 44.4%, 34.8%, and 40% of all patients. Interestingly, the incidence of a significant decrease of serum AMH levels at postoperative 2 months was considerably higher in LH group compare to non-LH group (43.9% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was an independent risk factor for the significant decrease of serum AMH at postoperative 2 months (Hazard ratio 4.147, 95% confidence interval 1.139-15.097). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with electro-thermal vessel ligation, might have negative effect on ovarian reserve after surgery. More large-scaled, long-term follow-up study is required. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据