4.5 Article

Dietary inflammatory index and risk of renal cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 1207-1213

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-017-1403-5

关键词

Dietary inflammatory index (DII); Diet; Inflammation; Renal cancer risk; Cohort

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R44DK103377] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCATS NIH HHS [KL2 TR000113, UL1 TR000114] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R44 DK103377] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association between inflammatory potential of diet and renal cancer risk has not been investigated. In this study, we explored the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and risk of renal cancer in the Iowa Women's Health Study. From 1986 to 2011, 33,817 women initially recruited at 55-69 years of age were followed for incident renal cancers (n = 263). The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed using a reproducible and valid 121-item food frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) adjusting for age, body mass index, energy intake, smoking status, education, pack years of smoking, hypertension, and hormone replacement therapy. Multivariable analyses revealed positive association between higher DII scores and renal cancer risk (HR for DIIcontinuous: 1.07 per unit increase in DII (corresponding to 10% change in the DII range in the current study); 95% CI 1.00, 1.15; HR for DIItertile3vs1 = 1.52; 95% CI 1.09, 2.13). Stratified analyses produced slightly stronger associations between DII and renal cancer risk among women with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) (HRTertile3vs1 = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.04, 2.36) and ever smokers (HRtertile3vs1 = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.22, 4.55), although the corresponding interaction p values were not significant. Pro-inflammatory diet, as indicated by higher DII scores, was associated with increased renal cancer risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据