3.8 Article

Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

ULTRASOUND JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00242-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Partnered Evaluation Initiative Grant [HX002263-01A1]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Grant [1R01HS025979-01A1]
  3. CDC [75D301-20-C-07637]
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared educational outcomes, course evaluations, and feedback from learners and faculty of in-person versus tele-ultrasound POCUS courses, finding that tele-ultrasound courses were as effective as in-person courses in improving post-course POCUS knowledge and achieving learning objectives. Faculty satisfaction with engagement and image acquisition troubleshooting during the tele-ultrasound course was lower, but learners were felt to complete the course with a better basic POCUS skillset.
Background: Lack of training is currently the most common barrier to implementation of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in clinical practice, and in-person POCUS continuing medical education (CME) courses have been paramount in improving this training gap. Due to travel restrictions and physical distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person POCUS training courses were cancelled. Though tele-ultrasound technology has existed for several years, use of tele-ultrasound technology to deliver hands-on training during a POCUS CME course has not been previously described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing educational outcomes, course evaluations, and learner and faculty feedback from in-person versus tele-ultrasound POCUS courses. The same POCUS educational curriculum was delivered to learners by the two course formats. Data from the most recent pre-pandemic in-person course were compared to tele-ultrasound courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Pre- and post-course knowledge test scores of learners from the in-person (n = 88) and tele-ultrasound course (n = 52) were compared. Though mean pre-course knowledge test scores were higher among learners of the tele-ultrasound versus in-person course (78% vs. 71%; p = 0.001), there was no significant difference in the post-course test scores between learners of the two course formats (89% vs. 87%; p = 0.069). Both learners and faculty rated the tele-ultrasound course highly (4.6-5.0 on a 5-point scale) for effectiveness of virtual lectures, tele-ultrasound hands-on scanning sessions, and course administration. Faculty generally expressed less satisfaction with their ability to engage with learners, troubleshoot image acquisition, and provide feedback during the tele-ultrasound course but felt learners completed the tele-ultrasound course with a better basic POCUS skillset. Conclusions: Compared to a traditional in-person course, tele-ultrasound POCUS CME courses appeared to be as effective for improving POCUS knowledge post-course and fulfilling learning objectives. Our findings can serve as a roadmap for educators seeking guidance on development of a tele-ultrasound POCUS training course whose demand will likely persist beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据