4.7 Article

SCSit: A high-efficiency preprocessing tool for single-cell sequencing data from SPLiT-seq

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.021

关键词

SCSit; Single cell sequencing; SPLiT-seq; Preprocessing tool; Cell type identification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31760316, 32060149, 31871326]
  2. Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [320RC500, ZDKJ201815]
  3. Priming Scientific Research Founda-tion of Hainan University (KYQD) [(ZR) 1721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SCSit is an efficient preprocessing tool for single-cell sequencing data from SPLiTseq, improving the consistency of identified reads and doubling the mapped reads compared to the original method.
SPLIT seg provides a low-cost platform to generate single-cell data by labeling the cellular origin of RNA through four rounds of combinatorial barcoding. However, an automatic and rapid method for preprocessing and classifying single-cell sequencing (SCS) data from SPLiT-seq, which directly identified and labeled combinatorial barcoding reads and distinguished special cell sequencing data, is currently lacking. Here, we develop a high-efficiency preprocessing tool for single-cell sequencing data from SPLiTseq (SCSit), which can directly identify combinatorial barcodes and UMI of cell types and obtain more labeled reads, and remarkably enhance the retained data from SCS due to the exact alignment of insertion and deletion. Compared with the original method used in SPLiT-seq, the consistency of identified reads from SCSit increases to 97%, and mapped reads are twice than the original. Furthermore, the runtime of SCSit is less than 10% of the original. It can accurately and rapidly analyze SPLiT-seq raw data and obtain labeled reads, as well as effectively improve the single-cell data from SPLiT-seq platform. The data and source of SCSit are available on the GitHub website (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据