3.8 Proceedings Paper

An Adaptive Energy Optimization Mechanism for Decentralized Smart Healthcare Applications

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/VTC2021-Spring51267.2021.9448673

关键词

Green and sustainable systems; smart and connected; healthcare; ADO

资金

  1. Research Chair of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  2. PIFI 2020, China [2020VBC0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an adaptive duty-cycle optimization algorithm and a joint Green and sustainable healthcare framework to enhance energy saving and reliability. Theoretical and experimental analysis shows that these methods can improve energy saving and reliability by 24.43% and 36.54% respectively. This suggests that the proposed algorithm has great potential for energy constrained sensor devices in smart and connected healthcare platform.
Body Sensor Networks (BSNs) is the emerging driver to revolutionize the entire landscape of the medical field. However, sensor-based handheld devices suffer from high power drain and limited battery life, due to their resource-constrained nature. Hybridization of different energy control methods and protocol layers is a best approach to enhance the performance perimeters for smart and connected healthcare. Thus, this paper mainly contributes in two ways. First, adaptive duty-cycle optimization algorithm (ADO), is proposed which optimizes the active time by considering the specific power level which leads to more energy saving instead of increasing the sleep period unlike the traditional methods. Second, joint Green and sustainable healthcare framework is proposed. Extensive theoretical and experimental analysis is performed by adopting real-time data sets with Monte Carlo simulation in MATLAB, and it is revealed that proposed algorithm enhance reliability and energy saving by 24.43%, 36.54%, respectively. Thus it can be said that proposed algorithm have more potential for energy constrained sensor devices in smart and connected healthcare platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据