4.5 Article

Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effects of C9-13-CPs in macrophages

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 1154-1165

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/abbs/gmab094

关键词

SCCPs; C9-13-CPs; RAW264.7 cells; immunotoxicity; immunomodulatory cytokines

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ19B070006]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT17R97]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) and C9-13-CPs, as organic pollutants, have immunomodulatory effects, potentially through the beta(2)-AR/AMPK/NF-kappa B signaling pathway.
Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) have been listed as a new class of persistent organic pollutants by the Stockholm Convention. SCCPs exhibit carcinogenic-, endocrine-, and metabolism-disrupting effects. However, the knowledge of the immunomodulatory effects of SCCPs and their underlying mechanisms, especially in specific immune cells, remains limited. In addition to SCCPs, C9-13-CPs have also been detected in humans. In this study, murine RAW264.7 macrophages were exposed to C9-13-CPs at environmentally relevant concentrations to investigate whether or how C9-13-CPs exhibit immunomodulatory effects. The results showed that the exposure of RAW264.7 cells to C9-13-CPs increased cell viability, as assayed by MTT analysis at 490 nm, and also promoted cell proliferation, as indicated by EdU uptake assay, which was measured at excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 and 512 nm, respectively. In addition, exposure to C9-13-CPs not only led to elevated ATP level and intracellular Ca2+ level but also caused AMPK signaling activation and NF-kappa B signaling inhibition. Moreover, molecular docking showed that the beta(2)-AR receptor could bind to C9-13-CPs. Taken together, these results suggest that the immune dysfunction of RAW264.7 cells caused by C9-13-CPs is closely related to the beta(2)-AR/AMPK/NF-kappa B signaling axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据