4.8 Article

Self-referencing biosensors using Fano resonance in periodic aluminium nanostructures

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 13, 期 42, 页码 17775-17783

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr03799d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [108-2221-E-001-019-MY3]
  2. Academia Sinica [AS-KPQ-110-EIMD, AS-BRPT-11014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research demonstrates that Fano resonance in an aluminum capped nanoslit array can eliminate the signal of bulk refractive index changes, enabling measurement of only the bio-layer thickness without interference.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is an important technique for real-time and label-free detection of specific binding biomolecules. However, conventional SPR signals come from both the surface binding biomolecules and the variation in the bulk refractive index. This work demonstrates that Fano resonance in an aluminum capped nanoslit array has the ability to remove the signal of bulk refractive index changes from the SPR signal. As compared to gold nanostructures, the aluminum nanostructure provides an asymmetrical Fano resonance with clear peak and dip wavelengths. The peak wavelength is close to the grating resonance condition. The evanescent depth at the peak wavelength is up to several microns. The dip wavelength comes from the SPR effect. The evanescent depth at the dip wavelength is about 300 nm. By simultaneously measuring the shifts of peaks and the dip wavelengths, the variation in the bulk refractive index can be removed and only the biolayer thickness is measured. The finite-difference time-domain calculation shows that the 470 nm-period nanoslit array with 90 and 70 nm slit depths has the optimal thickness sensitivity. In this experiment, a simple multispectral imaging system is developed for multiple bio-interaction measurements. The measured results verify that the bulk refractive index changes can be removed and the surface biomolecular interactions can be directly obtained without the need of a reference channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据