4.7 Article

Novel rhynchophylline analogues as microvascular relaxation agents for the treatment of microvascular dysfunction caused by diabetes

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 657-664

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.08.026

关键词

Microvascular dysfunction; Rhynchophylline; Diabetes

资金

  1. STCSM [15401901900]
  2. NSFC [21572039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dysfunction in vascular reactivity in the micro- and macrocirculation is well established in cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about methods that may improve vascular reactivity in patients likely to develop microvascular dysfunction. One of the racemic analogues of rhynchophylline (G2) and its stereoisomers (G2-a and G2-b) were synthesized to address this knowledge gap. The preliminary pharmaceutical studies on the relaxation of the rat thoracic aorta showed that G2 and its stereoisomers are more potent (at least 30-fold) than the natural product rhynchophylline, which encouraged us to further investigate their functions and mechanisms as treatments for microvascular dysfunction caused by diabetes. G2-a displayed the best microvascular relaxation activity on rat mesenteric arteries among the three compounds, and G2 or G2-a caused relaxation in an endothelium-dependent manner. In ex vivo tests, G2 and G2-a exhibited a weaker potency in inducing microvascular relaxation in mesenteric arteries from diabetic rats than from normal rats, most likely, due to microvascular endothelium damage caused by diabetes. However, based on the animal studies, G2 ameliorated diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction in rat mesenteric arteries in vivo. Further investigations of the mechanism showed that G2 mainly induced the recovery of endothelial function by upregulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and further increasing the concentration of nitric oxide (NO), which is required for vascular relaxation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS: All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据