4.6 Article

Coexistence of vortex arrays and surface capillary waves in spinning prolate superfluid 4He nanodroplets

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094509

关键词

-

资金

  1. AEI/FEDER, UE [FIS2017-87801-P]
  2. Spanish Research Agency (AEI) through the Severo Ochoa Centres of Excellence program [SEV-2017-0706]
  3. European Union MaX Center of Excellence (EU-H2020 Grant) [824143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study of spinning prolate He-4 droplets, it was found that small droplets are vortex free in their equilibrium configuration, evolving towards vortex hosting as their size increases. The stability phase diagram of spinning He-4 droplets is dependent on droplet size and the number of vortices they contain, showing a clear dependence on these factors rather than universal dimensionless variables.
Within density functional theory, we have studied the interplay between vortex arrays and capillary waves in spinning prolate He-4 droplets made of several thousand helium atoms. Surface capillary waves are ubiquitous in prolate superfluid He-4 droplets, and depending on the size and angular momentum of the droplet, they may coexist with vortex arrays. We have found that the equilibrium configuration of small prolate droplets is vortex free, evolving towards vortex hosting as the droplet size increases. This result is in agreement with a recent experiment [O'Connell et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 215301 (2020)] that disclosed that vortex arrays and capillary waves coexist in the equilibrium configuration of very large drops. In contrast to viscous droplets executing rigid-body rotation, the stability phase diagram of spinning He-4 droplets cannot be universally described in terms of dimensionless angular momentum and angular velocity variables: Instead, the rotational properties of superfluid helium droplets display a clear dependence on the droplet size and the number of vortices they host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据