4.0 Article

Spatio-temporal assessment of groundwater depletion in Punjab, India

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100498

关键词

Groundwater level; Flow direction; Depletion; Recent initiatives; Water footprint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the issue of overexploitation of groundwater in Punjab, India, and the government's measures to protect groundwater resources. In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in groundwater consumption, leading to declining water levels and potential reversal in the direction of groundwater flow in certain areas.
Groundwater (GW) is a vital source of water supply for drinking, irrigation, and industry in most parts of India. In Punjab, the adoption of the rice-wheat cropping system has led to a manifold increase in the irrigation water demand, and about 73% of it is met from GW. Consequently, the GW level in the state is declining rapidly due to its overuse and misuse. To conserve irrigation water, the Government has recently taken some initiatives, including enacting 'The Preservation of Sub-soil Water Act, 2009', which prohibits early transplanting of rice for reducing unproductive evaporation, and thereby, the irrigation demand. This paper attempts to assess the impact of such measures on the GW depletion between the year 2000 and 2019. During this period, the average GW depletion in Punjab is about 8.91 m, with the highest depletion of about 20.38 m in Barnala district. The depth to the water table maps indicate that the area of the state having depth to water table more than 10 m has increased from about 30% in 2000 to more than 75% in 2019. The water table elevation maps show the development of GW depression cones in areas with excessive over exploitation and thereby, a likely reversal in the direction of GW flow. The time is fast approaching when the state shall have to undertake comprehensive water budgeting and appropriate policy initiatives to address the concerns of the depleting GW trend.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据