4.1 Article

Specific adsorption of phosphate species on Ag (111) and Ag (100) electrodes and their effect at low overpotentials of the hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100041

关键词

Phosphates; Adsorption; Onset potential of her; Relaxation time; Single crystals; Silver

资金

  1. CONICET (Argentina) [15920150100013CO]
  2. SeCyT (UNC, Cordoba, Argentina) [33620180100222CB]
  3. CONICET [3661-07/12/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the influence of the geometry of the silver crystalline faces (111) and (100) on the adsorption/desorption processes of phosphate species at different potentials. Different surface coverages and relaxation times were observed for the two faces, indicating distinct behavior during adsorption. The onset potential for the Ag(111) face was found to be approximately 100 mV more negative compared to Ag(100) at pH = 1.6.
The influence of the geometry of the silver crystalline faces (111) and (100) on the adsorption/desorption processes of phosphate species as a function of potential is studied, and the surface coverages (theta) and the relaxation times (tau) are compared. A reversible process was observed for Ag(hkl)/KH2PO4 systems from j - V profiles, where a value of 0.07 ML was obtained. For Ag(111)/H3PO4, a coverage of about 0.024 ML was calculated from anodic/cathodic j - V profiles. In the case of Ag(hkl)/K3PO4 systems, highly irreversible processes were observed, resulting in different charge values from integration of anodic/cathodic peaks. For these systems, the capacitance (C-(phi)) plots are well differentiated for the two faces, and co-adsorption of OH- was evaluated from resistance parameters. Characteristic face-specific relaxation times are obtained for each electrode by Electro-chemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). In addition, it was found that the onset potential of her for Ag(111) at pH = 1.6 was about 100 mV more negative compared to Ag(100).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据