4.8 Article

Model-driven mitigation measures for reopening schools during the COVID-19 pandemic

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2108909118

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; epidemiology; primary schools; secondary schools

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research indicates that measures such as student cohorting, proactive testing of teachers and staff, and weekly testing of students can effectively reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in schools. Controlling outbreaks in secondary schools, where students are more susceptible to infection and have different social interaction patterns, poses greater challenges. Additionally, other mitigation strategies like mask wearing, social distancing, and improved ventilation remain crucial components of any reopening plan.
Reopening schools is an urgent priority as the COVID-19 pandemic drags on. To explore the risks associated with returning to in-person learning and the value of mitigation measures, we developed stochastic, network-based models of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in primary and secondary schools. We find that a number of mitigation measures, alone or in concert, may reduce risk to acceptable levels. Student cohorting, in which students are divided into two separate populations that attend in-person classes on alternating schedules, can reduce both the likelihood and the size of outbreaks. Proactive testing of teachers and staff can help catch introductions early, before they spread widely through the school. In secondary schools, where the students are more susceptible to infection and have different patterns of social interaction, control is more difficult. Especially in these settings, planners should also consider testing students once or twice weekly. Vaccinating teachers and staff protects these individuals and may have a protective effect on students as well. Other mitigations, including mask wearing, social distancing, and increased ventilation, remain a crucial component of any reopening plan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据