3.8 Article

Standardizing the haemoglobin glycation index

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/edm2.299

关键词

diabetes; haemoglobin glycation index; HbA1c; NHANES

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U54 GM104940]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study established a reference population for calculating the hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) using NHANES data. It found that a high HGI was associated with black race, older age, higher BMI, and higher CRP levels, but not with factors such as diabetes status and insulin levels.
Aims A high haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) is associated with greater risk for hypoglycaemia and chronic vascular disease. Standardizing how the HGI is calculated would normalize results between research studies and hospital laboratories and facilitate the clinical use of HGI for assessing risk. Methods The HGI is the difference between an observed HbA1c and a predicted HbA1c obtained by inserting fasting plasma glucose (FPG) into a regression equation describing the linear relationship between FPG and HbA1c in a reference population. We used data from the 2005-2016 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to identify a reference population of 18,675 diabetes treatment-naive adults without self-reported diabetes. The reference population regression equation (predicted HbA1c = 0.024 FPG + 3.1) was then used to calculate the HGI and divide participants into low (<-0.150), moderate (-0.150 to <0.150) and high (>= 0.150) HGI subgroups. Diabetes status was classified by OGTTs. Results As previously reported in multiple studies, a high HGI was associated with black race independent of diabetes status, and with older age, higher BMI and higher CRP in normal and prediabetic but not diabetic participants. The mean HGI was 0.6% higher in self-reported diabetic adults. The HGI was not associated with plasma insulin, HOMA-IR or 2 h OGTT in participants classified as normal, prediabetic or diabetic. Conclusions The regression equation derived from this demographically diverse diabetes treatment-naive adult NHANES reference population is suitable for standardizing how the HGI is calculated for both clinical use and in research to mechanistically explain population variation in the HGI and why a high HGI is associated with greater risk for chronic vascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据