3.8 Proceedings Paper

Impact of nano-silicon dioxide on mechanical properties of carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composites

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 8999-9003

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.377

关键词

CF/Ep composites; Nano silicon dioxide; Mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticles can enhance the mechanical properties of polymer based composites by improving the interaction between filler and matrix, as well as transferring load more effectively. Surface treatment of fillers and modification of matrix can enhance the interfacial bonding, resulting in improved mechanical properties of the composite materials.
Nanoparticles could improve the mechanical properties of polymer based composites due to synergy of higher filler-matrix interaction and better load transfer from matrix to the fillers. Epoxy resin has high strength and modulus, and good adhesion strength, which makes it attractive for several industrial applications. To improve interfacial bonding between epoxy and silicon dioxide (SiO2), surface treatment of SiO2 is done using acetone and silane coupling agents. To improve SiO2 dispersion in epoxy matrix, the epoxy matrix is modified by mixing with amine containing liquid rubber. Ultrasonication process has been used for uniform mixing of SiO2 in the modified epoxy resin. Carbon fabric reinforced epoxy (CF/ Ep) composite with surface treated nano- SiO2 are fabricated using vacuum bagging technique followed by hot press. The effect of silane treated nano- SiO2 with varying filler loadings from 0.5 to 3 wt% on the static mechanical properties such as hardness, tensile, and flexural properties are characterized following ASTM standards. The experimental results show that the inclusion of silane coupling agent increased the interfacial bonding between nano- SiO2 particles and the epoxy resin so that the surface hardness, tensile and flexural properties are improved. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据